SolidWorks Simulation of a Clothes Hanger

The Project

The static analysis of a plastic clothes hanger under the loading of a jacket. We chose to do a plastic hanger because they frequently break.

Prediction

Predicted that the maximum stress will occur at the sharp intersections of the hook and the body because sharp corners are stress concentrations.


Prediction of hanger failure

Solid Model

We defeatured the small hooks because we concluded that their impact is negligible when a hanger is under the loading of a jacket.


Hanger model and real object

Initial Boundary Conditions

Initially, we thought that the hanger would experience equal load on both shoulders, with a reaction force at the tangent point where the hanger hook meets the clothes rack.


Hanger Initial FBD

Experiment

In order to verify our finite element analysis, we conducted experiments by placing a jacket with weights stuffed in the pockets, and increasing the weights until the hanger broke.


Jacket on hanger and fracture

Initial Simulation

Using the initial boundary conditions, the result of the FEA was as shown below.


Initial FEA result

Experiment vs Simulation

After comparing the simulation results to the experimental results, we noticed that the location of fracture as observed experimentally did not match the location of maximum stress observed by simulation.


Simulation does not match the experiment

Revisited Boundary Conditions

Since the simulation and experiment did not agree, we revisited the boundary conditions and noticed that as humans, we tend to hang jackets unevenly on a hanger in order to balance the hanger which has a naturally uneven shape with its opening on the hook.


Revised hanger boundary condition

Revised Simulation

The simulation was re-ran with an uneven loading on the two shoulders of the hanger.


Revised hanger simulation

Experiment vs Simulation, Again

The simulation results were compared to the experiment result. This time, the location of maximum stress determined in the FEA corresponded to the location of fracture in the experiment.


Simulation and experiment matches

Result Validation

Our simulation results then had to be validated using the table below.


Result Evaluation Table

Model Validation

The model was first validated by comparing the FEA displacement to the experiment displacement.

Displacement of real-life and FEA match, validating the model.


Displacement Evaluation

Solution Validation

Divergence when decreasing element size at stress concentrations.


Hanger solution diverges

Therefore, the solution is invalid. Any adjustments hereon will not be strongly reflective of the real-life scenario.


Geometry Adjustment

We added fillets to the location of stress singularities.


Added fillets to the hanger model

Solution Validation Again

This time, the solution was validated by the convergence test.


Solution validated by convergence test

Additionally, the solution was also validated by the sensitivity test.


Solution validated by sensitivity test

Design Validation

To validate our design, we looked at the properties of our hanger.

The maximum stress fracture theory states that the maximum principal stress must be greater than the fracture strength, or 35 MPa for polystyrene.

Since SolidWorks is a linear solver, used the result of our experiment and scaled the SolidWorks result accordingly by adjusting the fillet size of the FEA until the fracture strength was obtained.


Design validation of hanger

According to the sensitivity test, however, the fillet radius must be unrealistically large for the stress to reach the fracture strength.


Hanger sensitivity scaling

Therefore, we concluded that our results are difficult to validate.


Hanger result invalid

Design Implication

We were still able to make design conclusions using FEA as the model and solution were validated.


Hanger design questions

Why is the bottom of the hook curved?

We ran an FEA on the hanger without a hook and found that the stress is higher without the hook. Therefore, the hook may be curved at the bottom to reduce the stress.


Hanger bottom hook FEA

Why is the cross-section round?

We ran an FEA on the hanger with a square cross-section and noticed that the stress is actually lower with a square-cross section. Therefore, stress cannot be the reason why the cross-section is round. Maybe a circular profile is easier to remove out of the injection mold case?


Hanger cross section FEA

Why are the sides curved?

From our FEA studies, we learned that sharp corners lead to high stresses. Therefore, sharp corners should be avoided.


Hanger design change

Conclusion

Experiments have shown that the hanger can withstand up to 6.1 kg, or about 3 really heavy jackets, before the hanger breaks. This is more than enough for a cheap hanger to hold!